Editor’s Note
Dear Readers,

Cyber
Terrorism has been a term which is engaging our attention for quite
some time. While terrorism on the physical space has been an
inevitable part of our life, as we move some of our critical economic
activities such as Banking, Investment and E-Governance on to the
Cyber Space, the threats of Cyber Space being used to further the
cause of terrorism looms large on the society.
After the
terrible 26/11 attack in Mumbai, there was sudden realization that
misuse of Cyber Space for terrorist objectives need to be tackled with
an appropriate legislative response. This resulted in the then pending
amendments to ITA 2000 being speeded up and passed by the Parliament
in December 2008.
One of the
key changes that were made to the legislation in the amendments (ITA
2008) was the introduction of section 66F which described an offence
titled “Cyber Terrorism” and prescribed “Life Imprisonment” as the
possible punishment.
We have
completed more than an year after the definition of “Cyber Terrorism”
was inserted into our statute and the Kasab trial has been
successfully completed without the invoking of Section 66F (Which
incidentally became effective only from October 27, 2009 and is
relevant for future attacks of similar nature). It is time now to
examine the Section 66F of ITA 2008 on how it has addressed the issue
and how it impacts the Corporate sector in particular.
The first
thought that occurs to the ordinary observer is “Whether Cyber
Terrorism is different from Terrorism as we know today?”, “Is it meant
to protect the Physical Space? Or Cyber Space?”, “If Cyber Terrorism
is terrorism with Cyber Tools, is it not already covered under IPC or
UAPA? (POTA)”, “Does Section 66F also cover Cyber Warfare?” etc.
An attempt
is made here to throw up some discussion points which hopefully will
provide a platform for analyzing the impact of Section 66F on
Corporate and also indicate some remedial action that can be
contemplated in an organization.
In
addressing the Cyber Terrorism aspects under law, it is also necessary
to address the dismantling of the support structure for Cyber
Terrorism. In this context we need to discuss the growing tendency of
Cyber Crimes that indicate a fund raising effort for terrorist
activities. “Phishing” in India is being used extensively to generate
such funds and a few Banks appear to be in the forefront of being a
support base for a network of Phishing fraudsters who systematically
execute phishing frauds. A few E-Commerce businesses such as Traveling
agencies are also being systematically exploited by terrorists.
Companies in such businesses therefore need to address this problem on
a priority basis.
In finding a solution to the problem, this issue also focuses on
mitigation of “Insider Threats” and approaches to mitigate them.
Na.Vijayashankar
June 14, 2010